Skip to content
Are you a participant in Parenting Across Cultures? Click HERE.
Parenting Across Cultures Logo
  • Home
  • Events/News
  • People
  • Project Design
    • Description
    • Administration History
    • Sample Description
  • Publications
    • PAC Publications
    • Dissertations
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Events/News
  • People
  • Project Design
    • Description
    • Administration History
    • Sample Description
  • Publications
    • PAC Publications
    • Dissertations
  • Contact Us

The Resistance to Peer Influence Scale

Home/The Resistance to Peer Influence Scale
The Resistance to Peer Influence ScaleAnn Skinner2023-02-03T12:11:35-04:00
< Back to Administration History

Description

This scale measures an individual’s capacity to stand up to peer pressure and behave as he or she wishes. This 10-item measure uses the item format developed for the Self Perception Profile for Adolescents (Harter, 1985). Each item contains two opposing statements, and the respondent is asked to designate which statement is more like him or her and indicate the degree of the item’s applicability. For example, one item reads as follows: “Some people think it’s more important to be an individual than to fit in with the crowd BUT other people think it is more important to fit in with the crowd than to stand out as an individual.” The respondent is asked which statement is true about himself or herself, and whether it is “really true” or “sort of true.” Each item is scored on a 4-point scale, with a score of 1 designating that the respondent has indicated that the statement reflecting the least resistance to peer pressure is “really true” and a score of 4 designating that the respondent has indicated that the statement reflecting the greatest resistance to peer pressure is “really true.” Statements are written so that in some cases, the pressure-resistant statement is presented first and in others it is presented last.

Reference(s)

  • Steinberg, L. & Monahan, K. 2007. Age Difference in Resistence to Peer Influence. Development Psychology, 43(6) 1531-1543

Publication(s)

  • Icenogle, G., Steinberg, L., Duell, N., Chein, J., Chang, L., Chaudhary, N., Di Giunta, L., Dodge, K. A., Fanti, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Oburu, P., Pastorelli, C., Skinner, A. T., Sorbring, E., Tapanya, S., Uribe Tirado, L. M., Alampay, L. P., Al-Hassan, S. M., Takash, H. M. S., & Bacchini, D. (2019). Adolescents’ cognitive capacity reaches adult levels prior to their psychosocial maturity: Evidence for a “maturity gap” in a multinational, cross-sectional sample. Law and Human Behavior, 43, 69-85.
  • Rothenberg, W. A., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Di Giunta, L., Dodge, K. A., Malone, P. S., Oburu, P., Pastorelli, C., Skinner, A. T., Sorbring, E., Steinberg, L., Tapany, S., Uribe Tirado, L. M., Yotanyamaneewong, S., Alampay, L. P., Al-Hassan, S. M., Bacchini, D., & Bornstein, M. H. (2020). Examining the internalizing pathway to substance use frequency in 10 cultural groups. Addictive Behaviors, 102, 106214.

Wave(s) Used

Youth: 3, 6, 9

Search PAC

Contact PAC

Rubenstein Hall, 302 Towerview Road Durham, N.C. 27708

Email: Contact by Email

Web: Parenting Across Cultures on Child and Family Policy Website

Web: WWW.DUKE.EDU

Funding

This project is funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Copyright Parenting Across Cultures | All Rights Reserved
Page load link
Go to Top